[weboob] [gilles.quenot at gmail.com: Re: weboob backend LCL]

Pierre Mazière pierre.maziere at gmail.com
Wed Nov 30 09:56:23 CET 2011

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 09:32:03AM +0100, Pierre Mazière wrote:
> > I think this problem is the same if you have a BIG bunch of
> > movements with the default 7 days range.
> > So I think there's no problem with the patch itself : the goal of my
> > patch is to be able to have more than the few default.
> The probability of a huge stack of events during the default 7 days
> range is certainly minimized compared to the 45 days range.
> The problem is that this pager issue was not anticipated before your
> patch, mainly because I don't have access to a personal account on LCL.
> Therefore, you, or someone having access to a LCL personal account will have
> to contribute futher in order to solve this issue
> > I think the best is to grab all transactions, all in one.
> Then, as explained above, in order to code something useful, I would need:
> - the maximum number of transactions before the pager activation
> - an anonymized example of all the pages composing a fully paged result

It's been 12 days now, and still no news from anyone about this.
From my point of view this case is closed until someone provides the
relevant data. 
If someone wish to do so, please report a new issue on the weboob bug tracker.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.symlink.me/pipermail/weboob/attachments/20111130/b75ca6d0/attachment.sig>

More information about the weboob mailing list